References & Sourcing Policy – Healthy89

⭐ References & Sourcing Policy – Healthy89


How We Select and Use Scientific Sources


At Healthy89, we are committed to using reliable, science-based sources when creating wellness content.

Because we write about topics such as sleep, gut health, hormones, stress, and daily energy—fields that affect people’s well-being—we follow strict standards for how we choose, review, and reference our sources.


This References & Sourcing Policy explains how we select, evaluate, and use scientific and wellness information.



⭐ 1. Our Approach to Scientific Sources


We aim to use sources that are:

Evidence-based

Scientifically credible

Transparent about methods and limitations

Recognized in the medical or academic community


We do not rely on opinions, unverified claims, or non-scientific trends.



⭐ 2. Types of Sources We Use


Healthy89 primarily uses:


✔ Peer-Reviewed Scientific Journals


Such as:

Medical and clinical journals

Physiology, neuroscience, and nutrition journals

Journals focused on sleep, hormones, and mental health


✔ Academic Institutions


We refer to research from:

Universities

Research centers

Teaching hospitals


✔ Government & Public Health Agencies


We may reference:

National health institutes

Public health departments

International health organizations


✔ Reputable Medical & Wellness Organizations


We use information from:

Established medical associations

Recognized health foundations

Evidence-based wellness platforms



⭐ 3. Sources We Avoid


Healthy89 does not rely on:

Anonymous forums

Unsupported social media posts

Non-scientific opinion blogs

Content created to sell a product without scientific backing

Sensationalized or misleading health claims


If a source appears biased, unverified, or promotional, we do not use it as a primary reference.



⭐ 4. How We Evaluate Sources


Before citing a source, we consider:

Publication type: Is it peer-reviewed, institutional, or academic?

Date: Is the information current and relevant?

Methodology: Is the study design credible and transparent?

Sample size & limitations: Are results strong enough to be meaningful?

Scientific consensus: Does it align with broader research, when available?


We prioritize high-quality, well-designed studies over weak or isolated findings.



⭐ 5. How We Use References in Our Content


In our articles, we:

Use scientific sources to support key points

Simplify complex concepts while maintaining accuracy

Avoid copying text directly from sources

Translate scientific findings into everyday language

Clarify when research is early, limited, or evolving


Where possible, we may mention or summarize the nature of the evidence (e.g., “small clinical trial,” “observational study,” “systematic review”).



⭐ 6. Transparency and Limitations


We recognize that:

Not all research is perfect

Science is always evolving

New studies may change the understanding of a topic


When relevant, we highlight:

Study limitations

Uncertainty in evidence

Areas where more research is needed


We do not present early or weak evidence as absolute fact.



⭐ 7. Sponsored, Affiliate, or Commercial Content


If any article includes:

Sponsored mentions

Affiliate links

Product references


we will clearly disclose this according to our Advertising & Affiliate Disclosure (separate page).


No sponsorship or affiliate relationship will change our sourcing standards or allow us to use non-scientific claims.



⭐ 8. Reader Questions About Sources


If you have questions about a specific article or want to know more about the research behind it, you can contact us:


📧 ibrahimoda89@gmail.com


Please include:

The article URL

The part you’re asking about

Your question regarding sources


We welcome thoughtful questions and feedback about our references.



⭐ 9. Our Goal


Our goal is to ensure that Healthy89 remains:

Science-inspired

Responsible

Transparent

Safe

Trustworthy


By following strict sourcing and referencing standards, we aim to help readers understand wellness topics based on the best available evidence—not hype or pseudoscience.




Comments